header photo

header photo

Friday, August 30, 2013

Week 8 EOC: Questions

Is secretly recording to prove harassment legal?

Infringes on copyright, what is my recourse?

In music, is it more important to copyright, trademark or register on ASCAP?

How would an artist go about keeping a contract?

I recorded some music while at the school; does it mean that the school owns the copyright?

At what point in starting a business and having staff, am I required to officially have them listed as an 
employee and start paying FICA and the like?

What are the legal requirements to having independent contractors as opposed to employees?

When do copyrights/trademarks become official and cover you in case of infringement?

What percent of a song would need to be modified in order for it to be no longer covered by the original copyright/registration?

What do copyright laws protect when it comes to “ideas” for audio for music?

Your Own Argument and Opinions

As someone who is already working within a start-up company, it is important for me to know the business laws that affect not only running the business but also as an employee at the business.  I need to know what applies and what doesn't.  I need to know who to reach out to and what to do when situations arise.  I need to be able to make sure that the owner is in compliance with the applicable health and safety regulations as well as labor laws and knowing what contracts consist of and whether they would be held up in court. Even if I don’t stay working for this company it will be of great benefit to me if I were to ever start my own company or even help someone else with a start-up. 

Even with some basic assistance from a lawyer, it is within my best interest to do my own due diligence and not solely rely on someone else to do the work.  Intellectual property is part of every company whether they know it or not and it is something worth fighting when someone infringes upon it.  It may take time and money but if you are serious and want to keep what rightfully belongs to you, you need to fight for it.

Rule of Law

With start-up companies, the process of finding and procuring funding as well as obtaining clients and keeping said clients can be difficult, but what can also be just as difficult is being able to pay employees while still keeping afloat.  According to the Department of Labor, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is what “establishes standards for minimum wages, overtime pay, record keeping, and child labor.(Wage and Hour Division, 2009) The Department of Labor also states that it applies to businesses that "incur more than $500,000 in annual income"; however, it also states that “the Act covers domestic service workers, such as day workers, housekeepers, chauffeurs, cooks, or fulltime babysitters, if they receive at least $1,700 in 2009 in cash wages from one employer in a calendar year, or if they work a total of more than eight hours a week for one or more employers.(Wage and Hour Division, 2009)
So those who are working for you now have to get paid, but do you pay them as an employee or an independent contractor? “The more control the principal has over an agent, the more likely that the agent will be considered an employee. Therefore, when determining if agents are employees or independent contractors, courts consider whether:
• The principal supervises details of the work.
• The principal supplies the tools and place of work.
• The agents work full time for the principal.
• The agents receive a salary or hourly wages, not a fixed price for the job.
• The work is part of the regular business of the principal.
• The principal and agents believe they have an employer-employee relationship.
• The principal is in business. (Beatty & Samuelson, 2012)
Start-up companies don’t always start in a commercial space.  Sometimes they end up starting at the owner’s home.  Now when would the employer be responsible for incidents that happen in his/her home where the business is also located?  The employer would only be liable for "incidents that happen within the scope of employment."  For example, “If an employee leaves a pool of water on the floor of a store and a customer slips and falls, the employer is liable. But if the same employee leaves water on his own kitchen floor and a friend falls, the employer is not liable because the employee is not acting within the scope of employment.(Beatty & Samuelson, 2012) So what does that mean? Scope of employment is a blanket term that covers any job.
Now you have a business but you want to protect the name and logo, anything that distinguishes your business from others.  Trademarks do just that. In short, a Trademark is a brand name.  You are not required to have it federally registered based on legitimate use of the mark but it does give you some definite advantages, “including the following:
·         Constructive notice to the public of the registrant's claim of ownership of the mark;
·         A legal presumption of the registrant's ownership of the mark and the registrant's exclusive right to use the mark nationwide on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the registration;
·         The ability to bring an action concerning the mark in Federal court;
·         The use of the U.S. registration as a basis to obtain registration in foreign countries; and
·         The ability to file the U.S. registration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to prevent importation of infringing foreign goods.(STOPfakes.gov)
To be able to use the Trademark markings, all you have to do is use TM after but if you have it registered federally you can use the ® symbol. This is all about keeping your intellectual property safe from others using it without your approval.  What happens if you end up with a case of Trademark infringement?  There are 2 steps, the first being fairly simple; you send out a cease and desist letter to the infringer.  The next step is only taken when your letter is ignored.  This step is much more complicated, and can in and of itself contain many steps.  The second step is to file a lawsuit. “Trademarks are a federal subject matter, and accordingly trademark infringement cases will often be filed in federal court. Most states also have trademark laws, however, so for local disputes you may be able to file your lawsuit in state court as well.(FindLaw)
As a company, there will be customers/clients and when you sell them some form of product, you create a form of contract, but what exactly is a contract and what does it entail? There are multiple elements of a contract.  In general a contract is “a promise that the law will enforce.(Beatty & Samuelson, 2012) For a contract to be able to be enforced by the law, it must contain seven traits, "offer, acceptance, consideration, legality, capacity, consent, and writing."  You may be thinking, a verbal agreement is often times considered a contract but there are times when it is required to be written in order for it to be enforceable. “Agreements concerning a sale of goods valued at more than $500 must be in writing.” (Beatty & Samuelson, 2012)
When working for any company, what you do when you are off reflects not only yourself but also the company you work for.  “More than half of the states have passed statutes prohibiting job bans on smokers. Indeed, some states have passed laws that protect the right of employees to engage in any lawful activity when off duty, including smoking, drinking socially, having high cholesterol, being overweight, or engaging in dangerous hobbies—bungee jumping or rollerblading, for instance. In the absence of such a statute, however, an employer does have the right to fire an employee for off-duty conduct.(Beatty & Samuelson, 2012) So if you are engaging in acts that start promoting a bad image for your employer, they have the right to terminate your employment.
Now you are working for a company, and you have been asked to do some sort of cleaning.  The chemicals that you use for cleaning are most likely hazardous in some way and that means the company needs to have it posted. The Occupational Safety & Health Administration, OSHA, came out with what is called the hazard communication standard, which “is designed to ensure that employers and employees know about hazardous chemicals in the workplace and how to protect themselves.  Employers with employees who may be exposed to hazardous chemicals in the workplace must prepare and implement a written Hazard Communication Program and comply with other requirements of the standard.(OSHA)
These laws are all available but knowing the difference between the types can help in figuring it all out.  The first source is from the Constitution and the other is statutory law.  A statute is “a law passed by Congress or by a state legislature(Beatty & Samuelson, 2012) and can cover pretty much any topic; however, they can not violate the Constitution. 
Now we know the source and the type but do they affect how we deal with issue that may require some form of dispute resolution?  There are three different ways to deal with this, “Litigation: the process of resolving disputes in court.
Alternative dispute resolution: resolving disputes out of court, through formal or informal processes.
Mediation: a form of ADR in which a neutral third party guides the disputing parties toward a voluntary settlement.(Beatty & Samuelson, 2012)


Works Cited

(n.d.). Retrieved from STOPfakes.gov: http://www.stopfakes.gov/learn-about-ip/trademarks/how-do-i-register
(n.d.). Retrieved from OSHA: https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/compliance_assistance/quickstarts/general_industry/gi_step1.html
(n.d.). Retrieved from FindLaw: http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/intellectual-property/protect-your-trademark-from-infringement.html
Beatty, J. F., & Samuelson, S. S. (2012). Introduction to Business Law. South-Western College Pub.
Wage and Hour Division. (2009, July). Retrieved from Department of Labor: http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs14.htm



Reasoning of the Law

Ryan Kastellic was able to provide some answers that weren’t all in lawyer jargon but in language that would be easily understood by anyone. One thing I did notice when he was answering the questions I was asking was that he was pretty vague, like as if he was afraid to share too much information to the point where he thought he was doing my homework for me.  Well that was almost the point of the project, but that only created intrigue and the need to dig a bit deeper myself.  He started the answers and then I had to finish them.  Though in the process of the questioning, I did change the focus from intellectual property to employment and more general business laws since I currently am an executive assistant to a professional chef.

The Questions

The questions that I chose are of personal interest to me.  Some of them have to do with intellectual property and how that would affect the music/audio that I help produce, but some of them have to do with running a business and can affect me in my current position as an executive assistant to a professional chef who has his own startup company.  The questions that I came up with aren’t necessarily the ones that I actually ended up asking.  As the conversation progressed, some of the questions ended up getting modified or ignored completely. So here is the list of questions that I originally wanted to ask.

Does my work have to be published to be protected?
The name of my company was approved when I incorporated - Doesn't that mean I am free to use that name as a trademark?
Can I fight a trademark infringement?
What is the difference between a patent attorney and a patent agent?
What is fair use?
Is secretly recording to prove harassment legal?
Infringes on copyright, what is my recourse?
In music, is it more important to copyright, trademark or register on ASCAP?
How would an artist go about keeping a contract?
I recorded some music while at the school; does it mean that the school owns the copyright?
At what point in starting a business and having staff, am I required to officially have them listed as an employee and start paying FICA and the like?
What are the legal requirements to having independent contractors as opposed to employees?
When do copyrights/trademarks become official and cover you in case of infringement?
What percent of a song would need to be modified in order for it to be no longer covered by the original copyright/registration?
What do copyright laws protect when it comes to “ideas” for audio for music?

Legal Authority

The individual that I decided on interviewing for this project was actually quite easy to find, but not necessarily easy to get a hold of.  He is actually one of my cousins.  Ryan Kastellic studied at The University of Wisconsin – Madison.  He now has his own law firm in Milwaukee which it just happens to also share office space with two additional law firms and is able to provide a level of expertise that is above and beyond what comparable law firms can provide.  He can take on cases whether big or small and not only work towards winning but also getting his client what he or she deserves so they can reach a decision that they need.  He is adamant and persistent; he won’t stop until he has not only been successful but also provided the high level of care to his clients.  I was actually able to get ahold of him through Facebook.  With him being my cousin we were already connected, it made making contact a little bit easier.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Week 7 EOC: Progress towards finding a lawyer

My initial thought was to immediately use my cousin back in Wisconsin for this project.   He has his since opened his own law firm after graduation.  Even though he, in theory, should be easier to get ahold of, he doesn’t specialize in intellectual property. He focuses more on landlord tenant, worker’s compensation and general litigation.  I did find on VegasInc.com a list of the top lawyers of 2012. It not only listed the lawyers’ names but also what they specialize in.  This was helpful since I wanted to try and find lawyers who could be of more assistance when it comes to intellectual property, business and employment (employees and management).  With this new source of lawyers I should be able to find someone who would be willing to help me answer questions. 

Friday, August 16, 2013

Week 6 EOC: Illicit Trade

Knockoffs are everywhere. You almost can't avoid it. Whether you are at a shopping center or shopping online, everything from hand bangs to watches to shoes, you can find some form of knockoff.  For a lot of these products they aren't covered under copyrights and companies don't hold patents on them due to the expense of it as well as originality.  The people selling these fake versions of these products sell them at a fraction of the price of the real deal.  Even though they aren't the real thing, it is still in high demand.  Everyone wants to be seen with the best things and unless someone is really good at spotting fakes, no one would know and the general public would have a different opinion of you just.  If people who could financially afford the real deal were buying the knockoffs just because it was cheaper, now you are hurting the bottom line of the manufacturers of the real thing.  it could also hurt the company’s reputation if the fakes started to make the company look bad with bad products that don’t last or are of poor quality.  On top of hurting the reputation of the company, it affects the company financially.  Yes it is unethical and unmoral but these people who sell the knockoffs don’t care.  They do it for the money.  It is something that countries from all over the world are trying to fight but it is almost a losing battle as it has created a lot of jobs in manufacturing these fake products.  So if you take away the knockoff companies, then you take away all of those jobs and the unemployment rate around the world goes up which could create all sorts of issues in other areas of crime.  How do we try to deal with this?  Well, we can keep trying to fight and take down storefronts with raids but as long as the manufacturing is still going on, the products will still find a way into the market.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Week 5 EOC: Apple-Samsung Patent Battle

Apple and Samsung are two of the top technology companies as far as cell phones and tablets go.  Apple has tried to ban older models of Samsung phones from being sold in the US and Samsung has done the same to Apple; both of which were denied.  They have both broken copyright laws.  They are both fighting each other to try and win but what will this do to not only technology but the way technology patents work? Mark Lemley, a Stanford University law professor and leading tech law scholar, shared that "it could fundamentally change the way the patent system works in the (technology) industries." (Mintz, 2013)  They aren’t fighting this battle alone.  Nokia is backing Apple while Google, HTC and SAP back Samsung.  In Apple’s case in San Jose, the jury found that Samsung had 26 products that violated 6 of Apple’s patents; however, they ruled that Samsung could still sell those products since Apple didn’t link any proof of harm it may have suffered.  Apple is appealing that decision.  If the next ruling sides in favor of Apple, “Apple would gain leverage in a second suit brought in San Jose federal court, involving a set of newer Samsung phones.” (Jones, 2013) What is going to happen? How will this change the face of patents and technology? Will Apple and Samsung end up having to “negotiate a settlement in their long-running patent dispute?” (Gross, 2013) Matthew Levy, patent counsel at the Computer and Communications Industry Association, stated that “It’s possible that both sides could end up getting little or nothing except huge legal bills.” (Gross, 2013) This not only could change how patents are regulated but also international trade.

Works Cited

Gross, G. (2013, August 8). Governments. Retrieved August 9, 2013, from Macworld: http://www.macworld.com/article/2046201/apple-and-samsung-patent-war-returns-friday.html
Jones, A. (2013, August 8). Technology. Retrieved August 9, 2013, from Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323838204579001070722801840.html
Mintz, H. (2013, August 8). Crime and Courts. Retrieved August 9, 2013, from San Jose Mercury News: http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_23806439/apple-samsungs-next-big-showdown-could-reshape-patent



Friday, August 2, 2013

Week 4 EOC: Edward Snowden

The Snowden case, yes, is about a NSA employee leaking classified information.  What is the core of the issue though? It is the fact that he breached his contract with the NSA. He did so by leaking the information. According to the textbook, Introduction to Business Law, the definition of a material breach is “a violation of a contract that defeats an essential purpose of the agreement.” (Beatty, 215)  The agreement was that Snowden, when hired, would not share secrets that he would learn while working at the NSA to anyone.  When he decided to leak the information, he immediately breached his contract.  His leaking of the secrets may not have physically damaged the NSA but what it has done is create a damage that could possibly affect the security of the nation. This would be considered direct damages, which “represent harm that flowed directly from the contract's breach.” (Beatty, 197)  Now the NSA wouldn’t be trying to get money from Snowden but what they could do is make it so he has been returned to the US and ends up locked up with no contact to the outside world or even other inmates at the location he would end up being locked up at. I think he should be brought back to the US so he can be tried for his crime, breeching his contract with the NSA.  Yes he shared secrets but that isn’t the legal issue.  Kremlin foreign-policy aide Yuri Ushakov, stated in the Wall Street Journal that “this situation is too insignificant to affect political relations.” (Sonne) So if this issue isn’t a deal breaker when it comes to the relations between the US and Russia, then it solely needs to be dealt with on a legal basis where he has to deal with the legal ramifications of his actions.